Newman’s daughters, but simply seeks to hold (Newman’s Own Foundation) accountable to the charities they have shortchanged in recent years and would ensure they receive an increased level of support in the future, in line with Mr. “This lawsuit does not seek personal compensation for Mr. “No one should have to feel that the legacy of a departed loved one is being dishonored in the way that Newman’s Own Foundation has disregarded the daughters of Paul Newman,” Andy Lee, a New York City attorney for the daughters, said in a statement. They also accused the foundation of “contradicting” their father’s wishes and intentions for years. Susan Kendall Newman, who lives in Oregon, and Nell Newman, of California, worry the foundation is setting the stage to completely remove them from having any say in how some of profits from Newman’s Own products are donated to charities. The daughters say their father, who started Newman’s Own Foundation three years before he died in 2008, allowed the foundation to use his name and likeness - but only on several conditions including giving each of the two daughters’ foundations $400,000 a year. They filed a lawsuit Tuesday in state court in Stamford, Connecticut, seeking $1.6 million in damages to be donated to their foundations for charitable giving. The daughters, Susan Kendall Newman and Nell Newman, allege Newman’s Own Foundation has improperly cut its mandated contributions to their own charities from $400,000 apiece per year to $200,000 each annually.

(AP) - A new lawsuit has exposed a deep rift between two of Paul Newman’s daughters and the late actor’s charitable foundation funded by profits from the Newman’s Own line of food and drink products. The goal of this review is to help guide the reader to successfully and beneficially bring the science of USGFNA to patients in an understandable and caring way.HARTFORD, Conn. Ultrasound does not obviate the pathologist’s anticipation of patient concerns or of providing information, including revealing a cancer diagnosis. Determining the location of a USGFNA clinic requires several considerations, as does the layout detail of the clinic interior for optimal patient comfort and experience. Selection of mission-appropriate ultrasound machines is discussed along with the pitfalls of purchase. Two national courses offer advanced training and certification. The use of ultrasound does not change the core need for high-level biopsy and smear-making techniques. The present review covers a wide range of topics, including incorporating ultrasound data into a report, the uniqueness of the thyroid as an USGFNA target, artifact pseudocomplexity mimicking neoplasia, the pathologist’s ability to acquire thyroid cancer risk assessment expertise, and distinguishing a true thyroid nodule from a pseudonodule with appropriate documentation. Because of perceived poor reliability in many local radiology thyroid ultrasound reports, first endocrinologists and then pathologists began performing their own ultrasound evaluations, cancer risk assessments, and USGFNAs. During this time, ultrasound evaluation of the thyroid has evolved from simply sampling a nodule to a reliable cancer risk assessment (CRA). This review updates a 2008 report on the establishment of a pathologist-directed ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (USGFNA) biopsy clinic in a private practice setting.

Private practice im fine